In reality, there is indeed a correlation between the internet and the overall intelligence of society. The real problem lies in the abundance of false propositions, false topics, false viewpoints, false summaries, and false headlines that flood the internet, attracting attention, wasting time, and faking judgment. Both the providers and consumers of this pseudo-content are immersed in it, finding it mostly plausible, irrelevant, and meaningless information. If people are constantly bombarded with such information, their intelligence will indeed be affected.
A recent article titled "WeChat is Lowering the Overall Intelligence of Chinese Society" has gone viral. In fact, several years ago, Japanese author Kenichi Ohmae wrote a book called "Low-IQ Society," expressing concern about the following behaviors among young Japanese people: only caring about things within their own three-meter radius; being able to talk endlessly online but unable to open up to others face-to-face in real life; lacking ambition for success, having poor learning abilities but being indifferent to it; impulsively buying things after seeing TV commercials; officials who shamelessly mispronounce words; giving up immediately when faced with difficulties without thinking; blindly following the crowd and doing whatever the herd…
History always has a tendency towards "reaction," and whenever something becomes particularly popular, voices of opposition follow. Recently, two things have become particularly popular: Alibaba's IPO, making Jack Ma the richest man in China—this is the overt popularity; there is also a covert popularity: WeChat has subtly permeated and influenced people's daily lives. According to Tencent's recent financial report, WeChat has reached 438 million active users both domestically and internationally. Jack Ma's popularity was dampened by an article claiming that "Taobao is a cancer on China's future economy"; WeChat's popularity has been accused of lowering the overall intelligence of society. Interestingly, this article was widely circulated on WeChat. The success of Alibaba and Tencent is met with both fervent praise and scathing criticism, which precisely illustrates that WeChat provides a platform for different viewpoints. In this respect, WeChat doesn't lower intelligence; rather, it offers a greater possibility for raising the overall intelligence of society. WeChat differs from traditional mass communication;
it facilitates the interaction and dissemination of personal information within a friend's circle, while also allowing interaction and connection between circles. Information filtered through friend circles can even generate spillover effects. All of this aligns with the openness of the internet. Therefore, if the assertion that WeChat lowers the overall intelligence of society is true, then saying that the internet lowers human intelligence is also not wrong.
There's a phenomenon in psychology where people typically only see what they want to see, ignoring other content even when it's right in front of them—the saying goes, "The lewd see lewdness, the wise see wisdom." The internet, including WeChat, is a vast repository of diverse content, of varying quality. The key is not what it provides, but what you want to see. Like the core question of existentialism, the most important thing is how you choose. In a sense, the internet can be a powerful tool for people with high IQs, potentially enhancing their intelligence. However, for those with low IQs, the internet's low-level information can sway them, accelerating their intellectual decline.
In reality, there is indeed a correlation between the internet and the overall intelligence of society. The real problem lies in the abundance of pseudo-propositions, pseudo-topics, pseudo-opinions, pseudo-summaries, and pseudo-headlines that flood the internet, attracting attention, wasting time, and eroding the judgment of the less intelligent. Both the providers and consumers of this pseudo-content are immersed in it, finding it mostly plausible, irrelevant, and meaningless. If people are constantly exposed to such information, their IQ will indeed be affected.
Research shows that computer and mobile phone screens, besides severely damaging eyesight, also seriously impair a person's inner imagination and conceptualization abilities. This is easy to understand; for example, when reading a moving passage, one can calmly reflect and imagine, but when viewing content on a mobile phone, this inner activity is difficult to activate, and the mind easily becomes sluggish. This clearly also affects a person's intelligence and health. In short, WeChat is a tool. Using it without becoming addicted is a good tool; becoming addicted and lazy to think will backfire.
Why has WeChat reading become a form of psychological comfort?
Reading WeChat Moments has become a habitual way of reading for many people. The author distributed 246 questionnaires to a university in Beijing to study the content read on WeChat, why people read this content, and the advantages and disadvantages of WeChat reading. The statistics show that people spend too much time on WeChat and read it too frequently.
The survey results show that the most frequently read content is, in order: life tips (185), funny jokes (176), life insights (165), workplace experience (145), inspirational stories (142), and health tips (129), accounting for 75.2%, 71.5%, 67.1%, 58.9%, 57.7%, and 52.4% of the total sample, respectively. Other content includes workplace motivation (105), romantic relationships (99), academic topics (92), rumors (78), real-life archive revelations (54), and other (26). The term "other" refers to content read beyond what was listed in the questionnaire, including news and friends' updates.
The survey found that young people "read" WeChat for several reasons: first, to kill time – whether commuting on the subway or shopping, long waiting times make reading short anecdotes on WeChat seem to pass faster; second, to relieve frustration – venting on WeChat Moments provides relief; and third, to quickly understand the rapidly changing world and what others are focusing on. However, frequent WeChat use stems from boredom, anxiety, and restlessness, reflecting a need for security and belonging, and a desire for attention, self-worth, and achievement.
WeChat reading has become an addiction, a behavioral dependence. On a superficial level, it suggests a sense of importance, prompting frequent WeChat checks. But in reality, no one is that important; the world keeps turning regardless. At a deeper level, it reflects idleness, anxiety, fear, insecurity, and a lack of self-confidence – a behavioral dependence. In other words, the underlying reason for excessive and frequent WeChat use is people's need for security, including a desire for a safe material and emotional environment. Most people fear and often abhor loneliness, feeling insecure when alone or by themselves. Repeatedly scrolling through WeChat is a way to see what their "friends" are doing, immersing themselves in the WeChat environment to alleviate loneliness and satisfying their need for security.
Currently, a societal tendency towards restlessness and short-sightedness is pervasive, even in holiday greetings. For example, in the Year of the Horse, blessings almost universally include "May you immediately have X" (house, car, money, health, promotion, partner, happiness), a phrase so overused it fosters a yearning for "everything at once." This reflects, to some extent, the prevailing mentality in today's society—a get-rich-quick mentality. This mentality stems from a reluctance to put in hard work, a restless attitude, and an unwillingness to settle down and cultivate a grounded approach, always seeking to skip steps and achieve instant success.
Surveys show that the most read content on WeChat consists of everyday life tips, humorous anecdotes, and life reflections. Serious academic content ranks fourth from the bottom, only surpassed by rumors, factual exposés, and other categories. People can't settle down to read classics; instead, they're keen on light reading. Doesn't this perfectly illustrate the current trend of restlessness and short-sightedness?
Furthermore, the excessive sharing of "classics" and "life philosophies" by WeChat addicts has become a bit excessive. Classics are constantly on people's lips, so they cease to be classics. Many "classics," due to the excessive sharing by some WeChat addicts, have not only lost their enlightening value but have also become superficial and vulgarized. Because people's ability to process information is limited, they always try to conserve cognitive energy and seek shortcuts in the cognitive process. That is, they reduce their cognitive burden by ignoring or blocking some information. In other words, the excessive, over-interpretation, and indiscriminate forwarding of classics on WeChat has led people to develop a sense of blocking, aversion, and even resistance towards classics.
WeChat Moments is a social platform, one-on-one, where you could say there's no single protagonist, or you could say everyone is a protagonist—everyone is equal. Various "shows" or "posts" on WeChat satisfy the needs of ordinary people and grassroots individuals for attention, their desire for fame, and their need for self-expression. If you're rich, you can post pictures of your car or house; if you're not, you can post pictures of the vegetarian dumplings you ate that day or a photo of yourself. Everyone can post what they consider important, unique, or something they're proud of. Everyone craves attention and believes their existence is significant. Therefore, anything can be "posted," and once you post it, your friends in the circle immediately receive it and pay attention, which implicitly proves your importance.